Menu Top


Periodic Law And Modern Periodic Table

Why Do We Need To Classify Elements ?

The systematic classification of elements is a cornerstone of chemistry, driven by several fundamental needs:

1. Organization and Simplification: With over 118 known elements, each with its unique set of physical and chemical properties, studying them individually would be an overwhelming task. Classification groups similar elements together, simplifying the learning process and making the vast amount of chemical knowledge more manageable.

2. Understanding Relationships: Classification helps reveal relationships and patterns between different elements. By grouping elements with similar properties, scientists can understand how their properties vary systematically (e.g., with atomic mass or atomic number) and how they relate to each other.

3. Prediction of Properties: A well-established classification system allows scientists to predict the properties of undiscovered elements based on the trends observed within their groups or periods. This was a crucial aspect of Mendeléev's success and continues to be valuable in the discovery of new elements or materials.

4. Foundation for Further Study: The organization provided by the periodic table forms the basis for understanding chemical bonding, reactivity, molecular structure, and the principles of inorganic and organic chemistry. It's a fundamental tool used in virtually every branch of chemistry.

5. Efficiency in Research and Application: Knowing where an element stands in the periodic table provides immediate insight into its likely behaviour, aiding in its use in various applications, from material science to medicine.


Genesis Of Periodic Classification

The quest to classify elements began as more and more elements were discovered, revealing patterns in their behaviour. Early attempts sought to find logical groupings:

1. Döbereiner's Triads (1829): Johann Wolfgang Döbereiner observed that certain elements with similar properties could be grouped into threes, called triads. He noted that the atomic mass of the middle element was approximately the arithmetic mean of the atomic masses of the other two (e.g., Li, Na, K; Cl, Br, I; Ca, Sr, Ba). This was an early hint at the relationship between atomic mass and properties, but it could only classify a limited number of elements.

2. Newlands' Law of Octaves (1865): John Newlands arranged elements in increasing order of atomic mass and found that every eighth element had properties similar to the first. He compared this to musical octaves. While this showed a periodic repetition of properties, it had limitations: it only worked up to Calcium, failed to account for new elements, and incorrectly placed some dissimilar elements together.

3. Lothar Meyer and Dmitri Mendeléev (1869): Independently, Lothar Meyer and Dmitri Mendeléev developed more comprehensive periodic tables. They arranged elements by increasing atomic mass and grouped them based on similar physical properties (like melting point, boiling point, density) and chemical properties (reactivity, common oxidation states, formula of oxides and hydrides).

These early attempts laid the groundwork by highlighting the periodicity of elemental properties with respect to atomic mass, prompting further investigation.


Modern Periodic Law And The Present Form Of The Periodic Table

The limitations of Mendeléev's periodic table, particularly its reliance on atomic mass and issues with isotopes and hydrogen's placement, were resolved by the discovery of the fundamental basis of an element's identity: its atomic number.

Henry Moseley's Contribution (1913): Through his studies of X-ray spectra, Moseley established a direct relationship between the frequency of emitted X-rays and the nuclear charge of an atom. This led to the accurate determination of atomic numbers, which correspond to the number of protons in the nucleus.

The Modern Periodic Law: Based on Moseley's findings, the periodic law was redefined:

"The properties of elements are a periodic function of their atomic numbers."

The Modern Periodic Table (Long Form): This law forms the basis of the modern periodic table, which is structured as follows:

The modern periodic table's structure is a direct consequence of quantum mechanics and the electronic configuration of atoms, providing a robust and comprehensive framework for understanding the elements.


Nomenclature Of Elements With Atomic Numbers > 100

As scientists began synthesizing superheavy elements with atomic numbers beyond 100, a systematic method for naming them was needed before their properties could be thoroughly studied and a permanent name could be assigned by IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry). IUPAC introduced a systematic naming convention based on the atomic number.

The nomenclature uses numerical roots for each digit of the atomic number, followed by the suffix "-ium".

Numerical Roots:

Symbol: The symbol for the element is formed by taking the first letter of each numerical root.

Example of Systematic Names and Symbols:

The convention uses the digits of the atomic number:

**Example Naming:**

Once the element's properties are confirmed, IUPAC assigns a permanent name and symbol. For example:

This systematic naming convention ensures clarity and consistency in scientific communication for newly synthesized elements.